Contributions
View by Category
Measured Mercy and Ordered Providence: A Thomistic Reading of Wisdom 11:21-12:2 in Light of Divine Governance
Joshua Villanueva on “the wise patience that sustains and perfects all things.”
Last Thoughts on Whether the Natural Philosopher Escapes the Eternity of Time
John F. X. Knasas has the last word—for now—in his exchange with John Brungardt on Thomistic Existentialism and natural philosophy.
On Eternal Hell, against the murmurers
Dominic V. Casella on Universalists and Perditionists.
Have I Alone Escaped to Tell You? Another Response to Knasas
Professor Knasas has kindly responded to my rejoinder to his reply to my review of his book. He considers, once again, Aristotle’s argument for the eternity of motion from time, discusses the limits of natural philosophic speculation when it comes to imagining realities beyond those limits, discusses the limits of the considerations of natural philosophy in regard to the human soul as a subject of contemplation, and concludes with a reminder to a text central to his aforementioned book (ST, Ia, q. 44, a. 2) as emblematic of his interpretation as part of the project of existentialist Thomism.
Has Brungardt Escaped the Eternity of the World?: Further Thoughts
In a previous Thomistica posting I contended that Aquinas reformulates Aristotle’s third argument for the eternity of motion. The third argument is the argument from the eternity of time. In this third argument the now of time is characterized as middle such that there is always a now before and a now after. The argument includes the unfortunate comparison of the now of time to the point of a line. The comparison invites the easy rebuttal that the end points of a line are not middles and so perhaps not all nows are middles. The third argument can, then, proceed only by begging the question about all nows being middles.
Natural Philosophy Does Not Lead to Heresy: A Reply to John F. X. Knasas
In this essay, I respond to various points and counterarguments made by John F. X. Knasas in his reply to my review of his book. (In what follows, all quotations unless sourced otherwise are from Knasas’s reply.) Knasas’s main focus is my contention that it is not necessary to deploy metaphysics to defeat the Aristotelian arguments for the eternity of motion and time. In particular, he disputes the end of §4 of my review, beginning with “Absent from this analysis, however, ...”.
Aquinas’ Metaphysics and Aristotle’s Arguments for the Eternity of the World
John F.X. Knasas responds to John Brungardt’s review of his book, Thomistic Existentialism and Cosmological Reasoning.
Further Defense of Aquinas’s Motion Proof
Daniel Shields briefly responds to the review by John Brungardt of his book, Nature and Nature’s God.
Recovering Aquinas’s Motion Proof
For too long has Aquinas’s motion proof languished in the gaol of a contemporary Thomistic metaphysics unwilling to fully countenance the debt which Aquinas’s metaphysics owes to Aristotelian natural philosophy and unable to recapture the ground taken by materialist, naturalist, or positivist accounts of the cosmos. Shields’s book represents a real jail-break and counterattack.
Martyrs of the Mind
The martyr can let himself be conquered by physical death; the doctor must hold fast to true knowledge so that he is not conquered by intellectual death. And if he does not have such knowledge, he should not become a doctor in the first place. For the theologian, not fortitude, but the truth, will set him free.
A Thomistic Defense of St. Joseph's Assumption
Given St. Joseph's pre-eminent nature in the Church and among the angels and saints, second only to the Mother of God, God would bestow the honor of accompanying Him to Heaven as He did for His Blessed Mother.
Aristotelian Hylomorphic Dualism
Hylomorphic dualism manages to keep the best insights from both hylomorphism—its unified account of the human being—and dualism—the immateriality of the intellect—, building a cohesive account of human beings that avoids the problems that arise for other forms of dualism.
A Reply to Michèle Mulchahey Regarding My Book on the Sermons of Aquinas
RANDALL B. SMITH
Randall B. Smith (Professor of Theology, University of St. Thomas, Houston) replies to Michèle Mulchahey’s Review in The Thomist 83.3 (2019) of Smith’s book, Reading the Sermons of Thomas Aquinas: A Beginner’s Guide (Emmaus Academic, 2016).
Aquinas on Happiness as an Antidote to Modern Life
CHRISTOPHER J. THOMPSON
In a small section of his famous work, the Summa Theologiae, St. Thomas Aquinas provides us with a basic tutorial on human flourishing. This well-known “treatise on human happiness” forms the skeletal outlines of the dominant desire at the core of every human heart: the inescapable need for happiness, fulfillment, bliss.
St Thomas Aquinas as a Model of Happiness
EDMUND WALDSTEIN, O.Cist.
The Greek historian Herodotus recounts that Solon, the lawgiver of Athens, travelled through the world and saw many things. On travelling through Asia Minor, he visited the fabulously wealthy king Croesus of Lydia. Croesus had his servants show off his many treasures to Solon. Then Croesus asked Solon who the happiest man…
Intention and Representation: The Case of Thomas Aquinas
JOÃO PINHEIRO DA SILVA
After all, it is a common place in the history of philosophy that Aquinas was, following Aristotle, a realist in various philosophical domains. At the same time, Aquinas helped consolidate “intentio” in the philosophical grammar. We can then pose the question: does Aquinas use of “intentio” lead him down a representationalist path?
Last Supper Metaphysics: The Causality of the Vine and the Branches
URBAN HANNON
Our Lord played a great many different roles at the Last Supper. Inasmuch as he was celebrating a Passover seder, he was just another observant Jew—whereas foretelling his betrayal, he played the prophet, and offering sacrifice, the high priest. He was a parting friend to his apostles…
De Koninck on the Existence of a Science of Metaphysics
In this paper, Dr. Glen Coughlin of Thomas Aquinas College discusses the views of Charles De Koninck about the necessity of proving the existence of immaterial beings before beginning metaphysics.
The Focus on Immanent Activity in the Second Way
After presenting the “first and more manifest way” of proving the existence of God by reason alone (without the aid of God revealing himself in Sacred Scriptures), in Summa Theologiae Ia, 2, 3, Saint Thomas Aquinas continues this project by turning in the “Second Way” to what he somewhat enigmatically calls “the nature of the efficient cause.” The greatest obstacle to understanding his Second Way, though, is determining precisely what Aquinas means by “the nature of the efficient cause” and “an order of efficient causes,” and how the Second Way is distinct from the First and Third Ways. This essay attempts to do so.
At The Heart of Being: Thomistic Existentialism & Cosmological Reasoning
By JOHN BRUNGARDT, Ph.D.
In the following review-essay, I explore in some detail Knasas’s argumentation and some of its consequences. First, I will look at some of the background to the issues regarding the contemporary Thomistic schools of thought so as to set forth what is at stake in the debate (§1).